The Patients' Front in Canada attacks
the primary (proto-)medical Modern-EuthaNAZIsm
This letter has been sent to all senators in Canada
June 9th, 2015
Honorable Senator <name>
We hereby ask the Parliament of Canada to refrain from legalizing the so-called euthanasia. Although ruled by the Supreme Court, the Parliament should not capitulate to the medical class.
Grounds of facts and law:
The Parliament of Canada is autonomous and cannot be ruled by the Supreme Court (c.f. Carter v. Canada, 2015) to enact the laws, not even the laws that the medical class requires. That kind of intromission is not constitutional. The Parliament of Canada should only respond and submit to the will and interests of the people of Canada, the people that the parliament claims to represent.
The right to life is the most fundamental human right without which any other human right is not even thinkable. Because those that are dead have no human rights. And the fundamental freedoms, too, are suspended (overruled). A dead one cannot exercise any so called freedom. One cannot talk about the life with dignity of a dead one.
Life with dignity cannot be achieved by killing people but by abolishing these harmful and lethal conditions that make people suffer. People want to live, but do not want to live like this, under these harmful conditions. At any rate one lives better being alive than being dead. Nobody needs a right to die, nobody requires a right to be killed by a doctor.
Are the doctors who demand a right to kill with impunity, a prerogative, a privilege that the Parliament has neither the duty nor the right to accept but on the opposite: the duty of the parliament is to protect the people against the threat that doctors are allowed to kill with impunity. Murder is still murder, dangerous at any rate and even worse if the perpetrator is a doctor.
On January 25, 2012, the 47 member states of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe have passed the following resolution: euthanasia is prohibited. Any propaganda in favor of annihilation and elimination must be fought against. Thus confirming what the same Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe had previously recommended in 1999, a recommendation whose title was "Protection of the Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being". In that the European Council had stick to the principle that the states had to guarantee the right to "live in human dignity in all stages of life till its end". In that recommendation it was stated that "a person’s wish to die never constitutes any legal claim to die at the hand of another person, let alone to constitute a legal justification to be killed on somebody’s demand". These recommendations are based on international laws and international declarations on human rights which are binding for Canada and its parliament. In Canada, medical doctors, too, should be subject to the law, and they should not be allowed to commit murder without punishment. Also Canada needs to continue banning euthaNAZIa.
Canadians want to live and not to die. In April 2010, the Bill C-384, a bill that would have legalized so called euthanasia and so called assisted suicide, was defeated by a vast majority. To put it clear: The Canadian people indeed have emphatically rejected the primary (proto-)medical Modern-EuthaNAZIsm. Now medical doctors are attempting to overthrow the Canadian people by means of a judicial decision. But the Parliament must not capitulate to medical doctors but they should respect the will of the Canadian people. Canada has also prohibited capital punishment based on the possibility that the death of an innocent person may occur. Therefore it should be noticed that based on the facts, euthaNAZIa and assisted "sui"cide surely will result in the deaths of people even without so called request or consent, to put it plainly, massive murder.
As the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada following the expressed will of the Canadian people recalled in the case: the ban on euthanasia exists to protect the most vulnerable people, the sick and the elderly, hence the people in general. That ban on euthanasia which is currently part of the Canadian Law is what the medical class, via the Supreme Court, is trying to demolish. Clearly said: the medical class is trying to abuse the Supreme Court to make a putsch: to enact its willed permission to kill with impunity. That obviously puts all Canadian People at risk.
Any alleged control measures are useless. Doctors do not abide to them. In Holland, where euthanasia has been legalized doctors continue breaking the regulations and limits. Also in Belgium, where doctors are allowed to kill even children under the motto of euthanasia. The Dutch euthaNAZIa legislation, too, was intended – according to the Dutch legislator’s own proclamation – to limit the illegally practiced euthaNAZIa to narrowly restricted cases. After the guarantees of exemption from punishment in cases of killing by medical doctors, given by the Ministry of Justice, had no longer been sufficient to keep that killing within certain limits, a first euthaNAZIa law became effective in The Netherlands on 1.1.1994. Since the medical doctors did not keep their murdering practiced on a mass scale within the limits imposed by the law, the least one could have expected was that they were brought before the courts and condemned for their criminal doings. But nothing of the sort! The penal laws were changed instead, in order to take off their strictness, and to take away the medical doctors’ fear of the law. The margins of the law for unpunished killing by medical doctors were extended with effect from April 1, 2001, thus more patients and categories of patients were permitted to become the medical doctors’ fair game worthy to be killed. As even that second amendment had not served the purpose to keep the patients killing by doctors in their greed for prey within the boundaries established by the law, it were not the medical murderers who finally would have been withdrawn from circulation; No! Once again it was the law to give way to the medical doctors. The excuse: "to dam up euthanasia by legalizing it and to prevent malpractice", invoked by the jurists and backbenchers of The Netherlands, has been unmasked and exposed.
Each time the medical doctors are allowed to kill without punishment and they feel protected by law and judges, it results in massive genocide of patients; just remember the so called Euthanasia-Programme (Aktion-T4) during the NAZI regime but do not forget the mentioned of Holland or Belgium today where euthaNAZIa has been legalized and thousands of patients are being killed every year, even without their consent or against their will according to the own official law standards, thus even leaving aside that one should always question if there really exists such thing as a will to be killed but one better should suspect of those noxious circumstances where there is still someone asking for being killed and/or is giving his/her consent for it.
As said, the Canadians, as everybody, want to live and not to die. The defeated Bill C-384 is just an example of that will. That is the voice of the people, the voice of the citizens the parliament should submit to, rather than to the dictums of the medical class.
The Canadian Parliament should refrain from legalizing the so-called euthanasia. Although prescribed by the Supreme Court, the parliament should not capitulate to the medical class. The Canadian people is under a very dangerous threat! Stop it now! The patients’ class is the citizens’ first duty!
SPK/PF MFE (Ka)
Socialist Patients' Collective / Patients' Front
June 12, 2015