Surprise Attack and Clear-out

 

The following leads to the conclusion that only patients have a genuinely well-founded interest in overthrowing all existing conditions, and that the revolutionary process needs the medical help of the revolutionary sick people; that the universally developed concept of illness is the navel through which the new man is connected with his indivisible species.

The ancient slave-holding society and the anachronistic society of the free late-capitalists are said to have limited themselves – in short – to treat illness by the means of illness (whereby the diagnosis and the generation of illness were included in this process).

It is only thanks to the pre-conceptual genius of money that this magic spell [Zauber] has for more than two and a half thousand years dominated initially the societal superstructure and later on the basis, initially as a cult and later on becoming laboratory (German: Labor) and labor (German: Arbeit, work, job) in one (encountering, however, any frontal attack with that kind of mentality that you would probably trust most likely to a powder-keg that smells the fuse set to it).
If one ignores the fact that therapist, in the Greek patristic, simply means monk, which already indicates that cultic acts include illness, as if they were programmed by illness, then, one hardly will see any harm in the fact that the state cult in Hellenistic Alexandria was absorbed completely into illness under the coat of arms of the healing god Asclepios. The latter is said to have owed both his offending (kraenkende, offending with illness) and equally healing force (Kraft, also power), that supported the slaveholder-state, to his own illness, in this comparable to the epileptic demigod Heracles, and not unlike the half-animal (centaur) Chiron. They all were considered archiaters
* (artist of forms, hence the name Arzt (as they call the physician in German), and it is probably wise to translate archiater (artist of forms) as State Security Guard [Staatsschuetzer], and that according to an also quite military, not to say anti-anarchistic understanding of this official title or grade, as being directed against the already enslaved and those still to be enslaved. This not only because they were highly belligerent, as Heracles and Chiron, whose hands and fingers (manus) symbolized legions, healing and procreation, all in one!).

* arch …: German: erz (ultra), ur (proto-), ober (upper), vorzueglichst (excellent), erstrangig (of first rank), hoechstrangig (of highest rank), altertuemlich (ancient);
iater …: heil (heal)

Illness functioned as a remedy and also as an integral of culture. Cultic acts, whether as incubation rites, pharmacological interventions, chiropractices, or whatever, were considered to be merely stimulants, channelers, and catalysts intended to induce the tendency attributed to illness, i.e. its tendency to divide, to unite, or to invert differences into another, and to steer the divine, the human and the animalistic with regard to their measured synthesis, as well as with regard to their harmful contamination. Thereby, the onset of illness was seen in the contamination (intermingling, with respect to body and mind, and, in analogous modification, the intermix of humors or body fluids, elements, etc.). And it was conjectured that in the inversion of this contamination, in the sense of the de-mixing and restoration of the right proportions (eucrasia versus dyscrasia), consisted the effect of illness as a remedy.

Illness before and illness behind, no change of sign, no change at all, thus, circular reasoning, original form (arche), primordial creation, exclusive unity. The determining moments of the concept as the contradiction of appearance [Schein] and essence, superseded [aufgehoben] in the manifestation [Erscheinung] that represents them, will be sought in vain also by others in the cult with illness.

The negating affirmation, illness as remedy, does not constitute a concept yet. And the phenomenal fact that a whole social superstructure uniformly reflects its specific difference to the basis as illness is anything else but a phenomenon [Erscheinung], anything else but a reflection of the logic of illness, of its essence that consists of exteriorizing the human species [Gattung Mensch], where it cannot individuate it [individuieren] without any break, as detoxifying, collectivizing and propagating (increasing) violence.

However, in the matter of illness it was at least, if not comprehended, then all the more intuited: that illness was twinned with poverty. The common legacy, the genome so to speak, reveals itself almost casually as money, especially as the latter reappears in the cult quite unveiled. This less in the form of finding a treasure as remedy against poverty – because that phenomenal modality was reserved, at least initially, to the dream activity ("incubation") – but rather in the form of sacrificial taxes, without the tangible presence of which the celebration of the cult was not allowed at all to take place. This condition clearly shows the abstract level on that illness was situated.

Money also coined other articles and their owners, precisely by transforming them into owners of commodities and commodities, nothing else. To the total transformation of the human being into a slave-article corresponded the increasing particularization of that part that resulted from it: the owner of commodities.
He disintegrated in more and more particles, in psyche and soma, for example – to name just the most striking ones. In the case of the slave, on the other hand, there was none of this, that is no fragment of the body, soul, human being, person, but just an article to buy, to sell, to rent, to give away as a gift, and only as such entrusted to safe hands and careful use. Or, simply for immediate and residue-free total wear at the expense of the owner. Being human, belonging to the ruling class, money and culture on the one hand, and being ill on the other, were one and the same and were considered as an honorable distinction. The "rest", slaves, barbarians and other things were subsumed under chaos.

In as much as the matter of illness was considered being a question of contamination between the psyche and the body, it is now clear that the patient, in principle, could have belonged only to the side of the particle, also that he must have been an owner of commodities, capable of articulating himself, that is, among other things, to own slaves.

For, on the side of the article, no provision was made neither for a psyche capable of contamination nor for the small change required for passing the door step for the Cult with illness. However, in the symptom – with its referential character to sympathy – one’s sight was set, if not on torment [Qual] then, at least, on the quality of a something, in which the quality of the exterior and the interior, of the before and the afterwards were put in one, removed from time and space (Cicero), and this circumstance may have enabled the slave holder, in the subsequent consummation of the particularization of his person, to also concede to the slave the access to the cult.

Here, it is not primarily dealt with slavery. Slavery has its origin in the "division" of labor and corresponds to the functionalization of the human being as a tool, interchangeable with his fellow human beings in the same way as cattle (pecuspecunia, money) and other inventories of the productive and reproductive sphere.

In contrast, the transformation of man into an expression for money, and that’s what it’s all about here, has the meaning of what one would call metaphorically, with a stereotype of today’s biology, probably most appropriately a total defect mutation. While to the animal species, as a matter of principle, corresponds the basically non-surmountable division between species as a concept in its universality and the exemplary, as the empirical particularity; while the means of work and of subsistence allow conclusions on the perimeter and the center of specialization and specification; whereas even the isolated singularized [das Vereinzelte] remains, howsoever contradictory, expression of an essential unity in relation to the species, under the direction of the medium of exchange money it is once and for all over with the individuality (indivisibility) of this (germinal) rudimentary connectivity of the species [Gattungszusammenhang].

Once the radical [das Radikal] species has been replaced by the omnivalent element of money – and exactly this is the case with the transformation of the human being into a commodity –, then, the human being is, so to speak, levered out, uprooted, that is, to take the metaphor further, chemically pure [chemisch rein] with regard to the possibility of carrying out developments differently than in multiple refractions, in the general fragmentation of all connections into strange particularities, precisely those whose contamination can only be averted by money, and be it by stabilizing their "commodity-nature", namely: under the index of healing.

The substitute-species [Ersatzgattung], summarized in one word, is: value. It originates in the act of exchange [Tauschhandlung] on condition that different objects of the transaction, i.e. objects of different kinds [Gattungszugehoerigkeit], are each the expression of the same number of monetary units. Thus, for example, the commodity man corresponds to a certain number of monetary units, and there is nothing else in it, because everything else about this commodity is merely an expression of these monetary units, that is to say, the human being, whether skin, nerves, muscles, is separated from all value, but it is valuable, and that exclusively as an expression and as a measure of the number of monetary units under which it is imagined and represented (see below: anima idea corporis).
The fact that skin, nerve, muscle, etc. are equated with this imagination [Vorstellung, representation] and that they appear valuable as a result of this equation, because they have to do with production, is secondary, in their essence they are irrevocably accidental properties [Akzidentien] of money; because what matters primarily is to clothe the pseudo-species value [Pseudo-Gattung Wert] in adequately abstract forms of thought, as it stands out as universal form of the money-mediated act of exchange.
The transformation of man into a commodity has repercussions not only on the forms of their coexistence. In its effects it corresponds to a mutational leap towards the pathoplastic [Pathoplastikum] culture.

Thus, the becoming [Werden] of the "everything flows" is the category under which primarily the entire complex of turnover of commodities and flow of money takes on a conceptual form. By no means, however, it is intended that in this becoming real developments are taking place, such as, for instance, a real effective becoming [wirkliches Werden] of the human being that was transformed into a commodity, a becoming beyond this commodity status [Warencharakter].

As soon as it is thought, this category of becoming has coagulated already into being [Sein], by which the value-form identifies itself also in this larva (mask, disguise) as a dead end (aporia) of any change (defective mutation).
The Heracleic becoming of the "everything flows" is nothing more than the mercantile hypostatic rear projection of the buoyant slave trade that thrived in the harbor area of ancient Ephesus onto the universe. The Parmenidean being is the corresponding expression for the law of value, thus of the fact that in this ever-flowing becoming nothing really comes to be: that in all transactions of different contents the amount of value [Wertquantum] remains the same. It characterizes the culture-creative importance of illness that a Friedrich Nietzsche, some two and a half millennia after Heraclitus and Parmenides, wanted to attribute to the universe the assumption of an "eternal return of the same" in an equally unreflective way, that is to say that the volume total of the forces available in the universe can only be constant, hence the number of possible combinations a final quantity, and thus the recurrence of identical combinations must be as compelling as the same events in an (approximately infinite) number of chess games.

Despite being well versed in dealing with the values of morality, like almost no other, the birth of the eternally same value-form from the historically quite finite value-thing money was as alien to him as, at the same time, was the contempt for everything "morbid" congenial to his character.

The substantially dislocated, not to say essential madness [Wesensverruecktheit], of this approach has its crucial point in the mechanics of commodity exchange. It is neither the expression of an eccentric genius, nor the product of a spirochetal pallida infection. But it can be taken as proof for the statement made at the beginning that illness has been connected to structurally isomorphic thought patterns for millennia. The clearer these emerge, the greater the spontaneous disposition to suspect the presence of a disease, to see mystical powers and currents at work, the lesser the tendency to identify the fully developed pre-capitalist barter economy with illness, let alone with one side of its essence, its generic universality [Gattungsallgemeinheit]: the value-form.

The value-form, which exists nowhere else but in thinking, does not originate from brain-activity, is not a reflex of personal subjectivity, but has phyllo- and ontogenetically only the money-mediated act of exchange to its origin and subject. It seems that this fact at least was still intuitively present in the ancient ideology because it transferred the subjectivity, namely under the category of hypokeimenon (serving as basis, subject, substance), to the outside world, conceiving, therefore, in a way comparatively "materialistic" what, since Descartes, is considered as the principle of the self [Selbst] – because there is no other meaning of what the history of philosophy relates to the term subjectivity – as a matter of the personality, especially of the emancipated bourgeois, emancipated by the "division" of labor.

Thus illness, also as a characteristic of the sick healing-god, remained exteriority, something that acts from the outside. Even more in the state cult, illness brought forth this stigma. The associated rituals and procedures of the abstract exchange of sacrificial taxes against "values" are aimed at an object, "the sick one", who is separated as far as possible from the subject of the act of exchange (represented by the monk-"therapist"). Anyone who is in the state of "incubation", is without consciousness. An apparently dead person in healing sleep who is being used to form the contents of those rituals that pretend to celebrate the life of the human species in its specific difference ("atomon eidos"), that is in the value-form which exists only in man. A dead on demand, temporarily with an outboard engine, second-hand life.

But to be without consciousness also means to be without subject-object division, without subject-object relationship, because consciousness in the original sense of the word meaning is only another expression of this relationship and that division.

The coincidence of subject and object in illness, more precisely: the fact that what produces suffering has been created by the sufferer himself – suffering-set-in-motion [ins Werk gesetztes Leiden] – or ought to be created by the sufferer ["Leidenschaft", "passion", K.Marx], this fact is considered by (bourgeois) psychanalysis since Freud a common doctrine, which also Marx was following up on the basis of his fundamentally different approach. Furthermore, it is particularly important that the "Psychopathology of Everyday Life" refers to illness as a state of facts to which everyone, thus explicitly not only the "clinical ill", is subject in his daily life when he performs, against his intention, those "determined faulty actions" [gezielte Fehlleistungen] that just strike back on him as "malice of the object" as much as they have long since got an – illusory – foundation in the biologistic voluntarism in the form of an "… apparent design in the fate of the individual" (Schopenhauer).

As is known, it is the "unconscious", substantialised and objectified to the "sub-conscious", resp. the "volition" and the "genius" (Hegel, Schelling) that, abstracting from space, time, and reality as such, are to be considered as active subjects, what presents itself to observation as a disease given by destiny [schicksalhafte Krankheit]. The point is, then, to exchange the point of view of the one who mistakenly thinks that something just happens to him, with the point of view of the one who observes how he himself is producing precisely that.

In this view, subject and object merge completely. If the species is the principle of the unity, if the dichotomy becomes real as one and a whole, becomes a monad, then – under the historical conditions of capitalism – it (the species) can have its reality in the broadest sense (starting with the money-controlled ancient barter society) nowhere else than in (this view of) illness.

Thought through to the end, such achievements of bourgeois psychology and philosophy lead to the conclusion (so they say) that every patient has reason to consider himself fortunate, because illness leads him to the path of perfection (C.G.Jung), as, for instance, to the fundamentally pessimistic recognition that death is the best of all conceivable solutions, after that birth cannot be undone anyway by no-one (Schopenhauer). Ultimately, after all, death alone would be the species that unites and connects everyone, because it is death that reduces the supposed subject of division and disunity [Subjekt aus Spaltung und Zerrissenheit] to its identical essence, after that illness, beyond its function as a means of knowledge of the unity of the Self and of the suffering from it, makes the disunity far more noticeable – aches and pains and despair pushed to the limits –, than that perfection of the elitist "autonomy of the Self", as the recent bourgeois theory promises to those who, under its guidance and armed with the promise of attaining creative ability, are encouraged to turn illness into an warning sign [Menetekel].

But at least it cannot avoid addressing this aspect of alienation in all the breadth and depth of its significance, although, in general, it is careful enough not to call this phenomenon explicitly by its name.

If the invitation to recognize in the apparent randomness and strangeness of fateful events the unitary product of one’s own activity, whereby this product as illness is tacitly held to be (not exteriorised and) inalienable, then this is due to the fact that there are people who are also capable at least to produce something, namely illness, by finding, by completely and entirely rediscovering themselves, and by achieving fulfillment with all the generic and consubstantial forces [mit allen Wesenskraeften].

However, as already said, they achieve fulfillment as a defective mutation of the value-form, camouflaged or whatever by "will", "sub-consciousness" and expressed in hidden sympathies and symptoms which, as already briefly mentioned, Cicero already knew as manifestations of the consensus, of the cognatio, of the coniunctio naturae, of that point of coincidence between exterior and interior, in which (temporally and spatially) separated things are connected. And it appears indeed that the defective mutation is precisely what makes up the entire force of its essence, which consists in becoming equivalent to fantasies of mysterious origin, that is to live entirely for – but above all to get completely drowned – in one of the many roles that are prefabricated and class-specifically exemplified as biographical destinies, but especially as social roles, coined money, character, and that means (since W. Reich) with reason: (character) armor against the "sparkle of the protoplasm"; and which consists, on the other hand, in animating the value-form as that primordial norm (according to Kant-Laplace) that, is said to constitute the essence of all, with matter as the species as such: being explosive, concentrating in a flash space, time, both quality and quantity in one point and in the blink of an eye [Nu (German), nous (Greek)] and condensing them into dimensionable effects of death as the most abstract universality.

Quite analogous the money-driven act of exchange!
The exchange of equivalents does abstractify (Sohn-Rethel) space, time, quantity and nature of the objects to be exchanged. It is the spiritual counter-image of that primal explosion, thus, for truth, the primal norm of affirmative destruction.

The only criterion is the equi-valence. It constitutes the form of the exchange-movement, the value-form, which empties the thinking not only of all its habitual formal principles (categories), but also initiates, perpetuates and stabilises that qualitative change that enters as a determining part the defective mutation.

The value has been dislocated and displaced into the things. These form in all their heterogeneity only the shell of its substantiation (fetishism of the world of commodities). It seems that in this way the value comes towards the sole and exclusive bearer of the value-form, the human brain, from the outside, that it seems to happen to it, while it is the human brain itself that projects it as a form (arche) towards and against [entgegenwirft, entwirft] all experience, induced by the act of exchange as a scheme of thinking that encompasses everything. The madness and the dis-location [Ver-ruecktheit] of the brain consists in the fact that its bearers behave as value-things, as objects (primordial narcissism).

Therefore, it is not the power of the Schopenhauerean "will", nor the drives of an anarchistic "sub-conscious", that produce defective mutations in the form of hardly transparent coincidences and of fatal sufferings, illness instead of producing man as indivisible (human) species; those that impose phantasms, those that push to imitate and to show off estranged, that is to say alienated lives; those that actuate primordial explosions and elemental forces of nature, which have been reshaped (socially and historically) long since, towards a breakthrough by detoxifying the singularised isolated, by collectivising despair and by individualising human life as species.

Where social as well as natural being has been translated long since through (the medium of) the universal command of the abstraction of exchange [Tauschabstraktion] in equations of value (equivalents), before having the chance to dissolve in the known categories of conscience and being [Bewusst(Sein)], instances such as the "sub-conscious", the "will", the "genius" are superfluous, when it is about sensing the deceptions of the factor fate and to pick up the manifestations of what is hidden behind the sign of illness.

The principle of equivalence and the law of value do not need these instances in order to short-circuit anything and everything animistically, to "animate" it (cf. libidinal "load"), or to return him as "nerve of things" ( – refers to money; hereby, it is overlooked that the human being is not always a thing between things, and that money is nothing but the substance of its dislocation and formal-madness – ) the reality of life he has been deprived of (affirmative negation).

In this it does not matter that phenomena such as the animation of everything (animism) are older than the subsumption of society under money. What matters is that the "individual soul" in its origin has nothing to do with the archaic animism, rather it has its origin in exactly this universalisation of the monetary economy that transforms the greater part of society and potentially everyone into the commodity of trade and labor, the slave, but attributes a soul only to the commodity owners as – especially in the beginning – their common spirit, lately stylizing it for the needs of a particular psychotherapeutic fashion trend even to the repressed and therefore "unconscious" spirit.

To the division, rather: split of the substance of value in commodity and money on the one hand, thus corresponds the splitting of the living body into a commodity and a soul as the reified representation [Vorstellung, imagination] of an inalienable body [unveraeusserlich] on the other.

"Genius", "will", "sub-consciousness" are only extreme modifications of the pseudo-thing soul with regard to inalienability. It’s one’s soul one is reluctant to give up just as one is to give away one’s money. For many centuries both have defended top positions against better life in the hierarchy of "immortal values". Thus still in Hegel the "genius" – in contrast to the "sentient soul" ["empfindende Seele"], which senses the spatial separation of the body (res extensa) as a unity (posited in one in the sensation), and in contrast to the "feeling soul" ["fuehlende Seele"], through which state transitions like waking, sleeping and dreaming are felt as living unity, that is the temporal separation put into one – so the "genius" is considered the instance in which space and time, as well as all natural differences, are not yet effective, thus like a value, as an everywhere und nowhere, ever and never, as a "natural soul" ["Naturseele"] that is open to all influences and manifestations [Aeusserungen] without opposing resistance.

After all the previous explanations, it is not necessary to point out in particular the concordance between value as the transcendental (pre-structuring all experience) and universal forming principle and the "repressed spirit", synonymous with "genius", "will", "sub-consciousness", "natural soul" – soul in general. This concordance is obvious insofar as the like can be claimed for issues that are different in appearance, but essentially the same. Its origin from the transformation of man into a commodity has its base and reason in the (epochal) abstractifying act of exchange. The concordance, therefore, is essentially equivalence, not only equality (identity of opposites) in the sense of dialectical logic, because it has its root – and that is decisive – in the practice of the exchange of equivalents.

This circumstance makes it impossible, among other things, to suppose a false circular argument and makes it superfluous to endeavor the philosophical hermeneutics of the alleged rise from the "productive prejudice" to the result, which, in turn, being considered for its part a prejudice, is said to self-critically enrich itself; in short: this circumstance preserves one to make a virtue out of the necessity of Nietzsche’s self-thinking or inward thinking / self-execution [Selbstdenken - Selbsthenken], because it attributes to the practical activity of men the methodological primacy over the how of their experiences altogether.

Still less can it be about the truism that, as to value, one would have to distinguish between use-value and exchange-value, that value was based on a social convention, that as price, fluctuating according to the situation of the markets, "it manifested grotesque ideas" (Marx), and that it would have to correspond to a social need in order to become actual at all.
Superficially, it is simply about the contradiction that value and "genius" form a generic universality [Gattungsallgemeinheit], the coherence of which makes the substratum of this universality, that is man, possible only as (a mutation) of the mutating degeneration.

To deepen these connections, it should be noted that the conception of value and of the soul-as-genius presupposes a reality in which people and other things, in addition to space and time, becoming and being, etc. have no other function than to repel one another (repulsion) and to disintegrate in themselves.
Only the abstractions value-form and soul continue to exercise power over the contents of these categories.

The act of exchange does not only abstractify just space and time. The product of this process is also the negating dismantling of the person up to its anonymity, because the act of naming is considered itself as the most extreme abstraction of the sign-making spirit [Hegel, zeichensetzender Geist], as this abstraction that becomes effective in the act of naming is in its turn basically only the confirmation (affirmation) of the abstractification that has its foundation in the universal negation of the act of exchange.

It is nowhere else but in the conception of genius, will, sub-consciousness – i.e. short and old-style: the soul – that these conditions and circumstances are manifest, and these instances are genetically and actually nothing but the manifestation of the value-form that constitutes their foundation: they reveal themselves equally as namelessness and impersonality, as also as power, to which person and name prove to be just as little obstacles, resistances and limits as their repulsion in the "nexus" of space, time and causality.

 

(to be continued)

73 - ´75, Zz, 7/752

Huber

(written by Huber in prison 1973-1975)

 

From: SPK-Documentation Part 3, 1st edition 1977

 

Translation:

MFE Greece, MFE craencStw

Final editing:

Huber
KRANKHEIT IM RECHT

Patients’ Front / Socialist Patients’ Collective, PF/SPK(H), 14.07.2019